DeftBench vs Codility
Codility assesses engineers in VS Code and lets you decide how AI fits in: switch it on to watch how candidates work with it, or off to test fundamentals. Every plan includes an agentic AI copilot, and Custom plans add the Claude Code CLI. DeftBench makes the agent the whole assessment — every candidate works with a full coding agent of your choosing, and the evaluation scores how well they directed it.
Codility goes wide: hiring, structured interviews, and mapping the skills of the team you already have, with assessments designed by I/O psychologists. DeftBench goes deep on agent-direction skill, with every score linked to the moment in the session that produced it.
- Candidate works with
- CodilityVS Code with terminal, packages, and multi-file projects. An agentic AI copilot on every plan; the Claude Code CLI on Custom plans
- DeftBenchA full coding agent on every plan — Cline, Claude Code, Codex, or GitHub Copilot, chosen per invite — in an isolated, per-session workspace
- Role of AI
- CodilityConfigurable per assessment: enable it to see how candidates work with AI, or disable it to isolate fundamentals
- DeftBenchAlways on — directing the agent well is what's being measured
- What's captured
- CodilityReviewable AI activity per assessment, plus behavioural signals — keystrokes, paste, defocus — combined into a four-tier integrity risk level
- DeftBenchEvery prompt, agent tool call, terminal command, commit, and diff, with each change attributed to the candidate or the agent
- What's scored
- CodilityAutomated code analysis of quality, maintainability, and complexity, in assessments designed by I/O psychologists
- DeftBenchHow the candidate directed the agent — prompting, delegation, verification, override — with every score deep-linked to the evidence behind it
- Format
- CodilityScreen (take-home), Interview (live, in VS Code), and Skills Intelligence (mapping your current team's skills)
- DeftBenchAsync take-home / technical screen
- Custom tasks
- CodilityBuild custom tasks from your own IDE and codebase via MCP on Scale and up
- DeftBenchRealistic, open-ended problems built around ambiguity
- Pricing
- CodilityPublished. Starter $1,200/yr (120 invites, 1 user); Scale $600/mo on an annual commitment (300 invites/yr, 3 users)
- DeftBenchNot published yet — pre-GA, onboarding design partners through a guided pilot
Codility details last verified against codility.com, codility.com/pricing and codility.com/ai-technical-assessment on October 20, 2026. This page isn't affiliated with or endorsed by Codility — flag hello@deftbench.com if anything above is out of date.
Choose Codility if
- You want the option to switch AI off and test fundamentals for some roles, and on for others.
- You also want to map the skills of your existing engineering organisation, not only hire.
- You need documented I/O-psychology methodology and certifications like SOC 2 and ISO 27001 today.
Choose DeftBench if
- Your engineers work agent-first, and the interview should always measure how well they direct one.
- You want a full coding agent on every plan — including Copilot and Cline — rather than an assistant with a CLI agent on custom plans.
- You want each score tied to the specific tool call, diff, or prompt that earned it.
Other comparisons: DeftBench vs HackerRank · DeftBench vs CoderPad · All comparisons
DeftBench vs Codility, answered.
Give your next candidate a problem worth solving.
We're onboarding teams in small batches. Book a 20-minute call and we'll walk you through a pilot.